From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 08:21:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD4B37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 08:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D94D43F85 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 08:21:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5647A66B9B; Mon, 5 May 2003 08:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 09E5712B0; Mon, 5 May 2003 08:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 08:21:36 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Thomas Seck Message-ID: <20030505152136.GB31920@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030505052615.R2996@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030505142945.15738.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030505142945.15738.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! Kerberos5/Heimdal now default! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 15:21:38 -0000 --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:29:45PM -0000, Thomas Seck wrote: > * Doug Barton (DougB@freebsd.org): >=20 > > I'm completely uninterested in what other OSes do in this regard. We've > > been doing a fairly good job in -current of tightening up the default > > install. I see this as a big step in the wrong direction. >=20 > I can live with a 'NO_KERBEROS' make option. >=20 > Having the kerberos stuff in a separate tarball and de-selectable in > sysinstall is enough to 'satisfy' my needs. I wonder why Kerberos was > always part of the default installation set anyway? With recent changes, Kerberos is no longer separate or de-selectable from sysinstall, unless you also get rid of e.g. openssh. That's part of what we're discussing. Kris --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+toGAWry0BWjoQKURAqqEAJ4vzpW08G/OY3YqPjJICwtB7yH/GgCfX8L9 pUBcFjgmjSVG6PYTWbCuJyo= =OcDM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yEPQxsgoJgBvi8ip--