From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 25 2:35:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D277E37B807 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 02:35:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca42-122.ix.netcom.com [209.111.212.122]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA06953; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 05:35:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id CAA05291; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 02:34:58 -0700 (PDT) To: Will Andrews Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Obsolete categories? References: <20000425005946.E445@argon.blackdawn.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 25 Apr 2000 02:34:55 -0700 In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:59:46 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Will Andrews * I was just looking over the list of categories in the handbook's * porting.html, and thought the following seemed rather obsolete (or don't * really deserve to be a category): * * elisp * plan9 * offix Why do you think so? They are all still used and are used to identify a collection of ports, which is exactly what a category is supposed to do. * Also, has anyone checked to see whether we still need those older tcl/tk * virtual categories? "grep INDEX" is your friend. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message