From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 2 05:09:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4DF37B401; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 05:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MX2.estpak.ee (ld1.estpak.ee [194.126.101.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A2843FAF; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 05:09:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from kevad.internal (80-235-40-230-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.40.230]) by MX2.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1227F73558; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:07:34 +0300 (EEST) Received: by kevad.internal (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE5B530ACF; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:09:17 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:09:17 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Petri Helenius Message-ID: <20030602050917.GB2247@kevad.internal> References: <3ED9E8AB.5060106@he.iki.fi> <20030601232426.A43338@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <00b501c32876$74502fd0$812a40c1@PETEX31> <3EDA600C.90104@btc.adaptec.com> <039101c328e2$09bce480$812a40c1@PETEX31> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <039101c328e2$09bce480$812a40c1@PETEX31> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: Scott Long cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Tim Robbins Subject: Re: raidframe X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 12:09:18 -0000 On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:36:18AM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote: > > left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand > > that I also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get > > paid $0 to work on RAIDframe. > > > Not being a native english speaker I probably didn´t understand > that experimental equals broken. If that equation cannot be > justified, then the release notes should have said "has critical > defects" or "broken", not just "experimental". > > I appreciate the work you and everybody else puts in, it just does > not make sense to have people go through the same hoops and hit > the wall when that could be saved by a single line noting that > that the wall exists. FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste your time. This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyone. -- Vallo Kallaste