From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 10 11:32:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B893154F9; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:32:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA153682265; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:57:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:57:45 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: foxfair@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/9657 In-Reply-To: <199903101317.IAA00169@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > We will just close the PR, so we can put a mark against it, and > have the poor shmuck resubmit it -- if he still has the file, of > course. And if he does not -- too bad, because not even a person > with @freebsd.org account seems to be able to get anything out of > the dark one-way pit the /FreeBSD/incoming has become! The 'one-way pit' is a serious problem. Either committers should have access to it, or it shouldn't exist. Mails I have sent to freebsd-maintainers@ftp.cdrom.com have fallen on deaf ears. > And he better follow the latest rules too, or else we'll just send > him for another round... I agree that the handling of this PR was wrong. I've re-opened it, if you could follow up to this PR, we'd appriciate it. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message