From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 13 17:21:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BB186A; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from makc@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.issp.ac.ru (mail.issp.ac.ru [77.236.34.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BBB8FC0A; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aruba-ctlr2-nat.its.manchester.ac.uk [130.88.99.218:7931] (HELO/EHLO mercury.ph.man.ac.uk, authenticated with LOGIN) by mail.issp.ac.ru with ESMTP/inet id q9DHLkZX078980 (using TLSv1/SSLv3, with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits), verified NO) Sat, 13 Oct 2012 21:21:47 +0400 (MSK) From: Max Brazhnikov To: Pawel Pekala Subject: Re: svn commit: r305793 - in head/emulators: . swine Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:21:58 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.9.1; amd64; ; ) References: <201210122156.q9CLuA9X082810@svn.freebsd.org> <201210131513.04741.makc@freebsd.org> <20121013181816.236e950e@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20121013181816.236e950e@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201210131721.58578.makc@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:21:38 -0000 On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:18:16 +0200, Pawel Pekala wrote: > Except this issue I fixed all your good catches, thanks. my pleasure. > I think moving this message to pkg-message is not needed. It's > addressed to amd64 users which will build from source anyway because > swine will not be available to them from package. Wine is marked as > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386 and is RUN_DEPENDS here. I`m little hazy on our > package building so please correct me if I'm wrong. I would add wine to dependency on i386 only and mark swine for i386/amd64. Of course amd64 users have to install unofficial package for wine, but at least they don't need build swine. And strictly speaking, they can install swine port right now, because it depends on wine. Cheers, Max