From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Nov 30 14:43:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421FB14C99 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:43:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA12227 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:43:09 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id XAA73487 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:43:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132B514C99 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:43:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whiste.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA99213; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:43:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 14:43:00 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Jason Evans Cc: Matthew Dillon , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads In-Reply-To: <19991130142555.F301@sturm.canonware.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Jason Evans wrote: > > tasks from different parts of a single queue simultaniously. I've > > never done this myself -- it's never seemed worthwhile. > > Hmm, this idea could have some merit. We should keep it in mind. multiple queues with load balancing.... (i.e subprocesses) :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message