From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 28 9:29:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc2.pa.home.com (ha1.rdc2.pa.home.com [24.12.106.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C3C37B8DE for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:29:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgowdy@home.com) Received: from cx443070a ([24.4.93.90]) by mail.rdc2.pa.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <20000328172927.EACK28012.mail.rdc2.pa.home.com@cx443070a>; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:29:27 -0800 Message-ID: <002301bf98dc$79ed86e0$0100000a@vista1.sdca.home.com> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "Martin Cracauer" , References: <20000328113633.A28085@cons.org> Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:38:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'll agree with most of the points you made. When 3.4 was all there was, I was content with it, because I've known nothing else. But after seeing how beautiful 4.0 can be in certain areas, (my favs are new linux emu threads and ATAPI rather than wd0), I would hate to go back to 3.4. In fact, I'm upgrading my work's mission critical computer to 4.0-RELEASE. I really think it's _alot_ better (as it should be, since it's a X.0 release). My opinion, although what people do with their time is none of my business, is that it would be best to have everyone concentrate their efforts on 4.0. Just my little opinion :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message