From nobody Mon Apr 4 23:47:16 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DD21A9B1A1 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 23:47:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KXS9z1M5dz3MXw; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 23:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from shw-obgw-4001a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.142]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id bOpdncESF43SgbWPmnQz9f; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 23:47:18 +0000 Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.66.148.124]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id bWPlnrMaB159UbWPmn5IPw; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 23:47:18 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=frTP2X0f c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=624b8386 a=Cwc3rblV8FOMdVN/wOAqyQ==:117 a=Cwc3rblV8FOMdVN/wOAqyQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=z0gMJWrwH1QA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=pQs5aej7AAAA:8 a=EkcXrb_YAAAA:8 a=2ORYVfnW6XLNWUsio1YA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=UJ0tAi3fqDAA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=LK5xJRSDVpKd5WXXoEvA:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034765CE; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by slippy.cwsent.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BDB231D7; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:47:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018 with nmh-1.7+dev Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Jan Beich cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thunderbird SIG11 In-reply-to: References: <20220404212119.4009F217@slippy.cwsent.com> Comments: In-reply-to Jan Beich message dated "Tue, 05 Apr 2022 01:21:06 +0200." List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 16:47:16 -0700 Message-Id: <20220404234716.BDB231D7@slippy.cwsent.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfBrsTtcRADgV2wDg5c9rMD+ZRWyXkaJcuiQAD2Sco+8fFdbKfTIwblyVGaYjgpXpURbLnmODmHQGe58c5MVE9nrMiac1GrtfQD06k9ThnMfZ0P1ZGjK1 8MYIU6eGCKCKbpUtxpGloiPpLIuSAcB0LXIbC24FZESYfD5KeIhMkLAzirYpOZpXqV/YzNPStsNGKWgaOJSwBEcTxfPu7mP6z7mZHBEGseYED2l//D8ZRvjB rNbcsTs/4wvd919c4qeOmA== X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KXS9z1M5dz3MXw X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cy.schubert@cschubert.com has no SPF policy when checking 3.97.99.32) smtp.mailfrom=cy.schubert@cschubert.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.69 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[3.97.99.32:from]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[70.66.148.124:received]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:3.96.0.0/15, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.998]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cschubert.com: no valid DMARC record]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.14)[0.142]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.35)[0.352]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[3.97.99.32:from] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N In message , Jan Beich writes: > Cy Schubert writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm experiencing an assertion in openldap24-client while attempting to > > start thunderbird. The interesting thing is that removing ldap from passwd > > in nsswitch.conf works around the issue. Has anyone else experienced this? > > Maybe files/patch-bug292127 is no longer enough e.g., if nowadays more > symbols overlap/clash. I don't use openldap* or thunderbird myself > and no longer active in gecko@. > > See also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=292127 That's the bug. I doubt mixing libraries is the problem. I'll try updating from openldap24-client to openldap26-client using DEFAULT_OPENLDAP_VER. Poudriere is rebuilding ~ 600 ports. In the worst case I can simply revert to nis when needing to use thunderbird for the odd email that exmh has trouble with. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: Web: https://nwtime.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.