From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 11 21:40:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527D637B404 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:40:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rusunix.org (rusunix.org [195.162.58.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D5F43FAF for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 21:40:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aquatique@rusunix.org) Received: by rusunix.org (CommuniGay Pro, from userid 1111) id 9A70F1CDE6F; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:40:18 +0600 (OMST) From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP: XFree86 4.3.0 update In-Reply-To: <20030311205400.K657@znfgre.tberna.bet> User-Agent: tin/1.5.16-20021229 ("Spiders") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.8-PRERELEASE (i386)) Message-Id: <20030312054018.9A70F1CDE6F@rusunix.org> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:40:18 +0600 (OMST) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <20030311205400.K657@znfgre.tberna.bet> of freebsd-ports group you wrote: >> Is there a diff for 5.0-RELEASE ? DB> If you're concerned about this, you should probably just upgrade to DB> -current. 5.0-Release was never considered to be a landing point, just a DB> starting point. it's superfluously I followed Eric's advise to import DRI from -CURRENT and got DRI on 5.0-RELEASE. aquatique@aquatique.rsb.local <~> $ glxinfo | grep render direct rendering: Yes OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20020827 AGP 4x x86/MMX/SSE TCL aquatique@aquatique.rsb.local <~> $ uname -a FreeBSD aquatique.rsb.local 5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Mar 12 10:35:38 OMST 2003 aquatique@aquatique.rsb.local:/build/usr/src/sys/AQUATIQUE i386 foobillard runs fine (with approx. 25% of CPU load) -- http://aquatique.rusunix.org http://rusunix.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message