From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 5 09:34:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E46137B401; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.gnf.org (ns1.gnf.org [63.196.132.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2558143FF7; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: from EXCHCLUSTER01.lj.gnf.org (exch01.lj.gnf.org [172.25.10.19]) by ns1.gnf.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h65GYQtF059092; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: from roark.gnf.org ([172.25.24.15]) by EXCHCLUSTER01.lj.gnf.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:26 -0700 Received: from roark.gnf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roark.gnf.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h65GYQi2052473; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gtetlow@gnf.org) Received: (from gtetlow@localhost) by roark.gnf.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h65GYQDD052472; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 09:34:26 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20030705163426.GO70590@roark.gnf.org> References: <20030703173035.GH86503@webserver.get-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Wj6ursgR4TQyKGvE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2003 16:34:26.0992 (UTC) FILETIME=[4CE37300:01C34313] cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Joshua Oreman Subject: Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 16:34:28 -0000 --Wj6ursgR4TQyKGvE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:07:57PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wr= ote: > > >=20 > > > I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jai= l to > > > give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ... > >=20 > > Well, all I did was test your research :-) >=20 > Gordon Tetlow (victim CC'd) was, I believe, working on changes to rc.d to > allow automatic construction of jails at boot, and part of that was some > best practice devfs rules for jail. Perhaps he could chime in now? :-) No, that wasn't me. If I had to guess it was either mtm@ or mike@ (or maybe some other Mike in the project). -gordon --Wj6ursgR4TQyKGvE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Bv4SRu2t9DV9ZfsRAh4CAKC3AdVMlu96VKfDi1A2jQUq0WLhDACgha6y p90Ee15KN7BGZWq9ixGehbE= =Q27w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Wj6ursgR4TQyKGvE--