From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 19 20:28:42 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100FD16A418 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outI.internet-mail-service.net (outI.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D079D13C428 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:28:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:28:40 -0700 X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (nat.ironport.com [63.251.108.100]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E50126428; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46F18676.5050507@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:28:38 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Gritton References: <46F03D10.2070607@gritton.org> <20070919145143.GD965@garage.freebsd.pl> <46F178E4.7050408@gritton.org> <46F181B7.6080803@elischer.org> <46F18420.2060209@gritton.org> In-Reply-To: <46F18420.2060209@gritton.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hierarchical jails - any current work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:28:42 -0000 James Gritton wrote: >> please please please familiarise yourself with the Vimage code that >> Marko Zec is working on. > > This is the stuff at http://imunes.tel.fer.hr/virtnet/, right? I take > it that's the definitive place to go. I recall having looked at that > before, and I guess I was thrown off by the "net work virtualization" > title and didn't know it was to be a general jail replacement. So sure, > I'll give that a thorough study and see what I can do with it. I still > hope I can contribute and not just have bothered you all to just end up > being another user :-). > > - Jamie Network virualisation is one part of the job.. it uses jail code to provide other separation, but it would be good if the connections were more 'formal'. We should have an official architecture for this sort of thing. Marco has said that one of the things that needs to be done is to spend time integrating it better with the other (read jail) virtualisation code.. That could be your name I hear being called :-)