Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 19:05:12 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@iafrica.com> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal: Define MAXMEM in GENERIC Message-ID: <63209.921431112@axl.noc.iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Mar 1999 01:54:46 %2B0900." <36EBE9D6.7E6320FE@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 01:54:46 +0900, "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > I'm against this. Magazines test OS as they come out of the box. This was the argument I raised in my original mail. However, it looks pretty ugly on paper: It is quite possible that you will have problems installing FreeBSD on your high-end machine, but you'll have great benchmarks once you do. ;-) Anyway, I'm loath for this to turn into an unproductive flame war, so I won't try to argue an opinion I've already put forward. Instead, I ask whether there's any other solution you can think of, since we're likely to see more and more people having problems related to failed speculative memory probes as >64MB machines become entry-level. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63209.921431112>