From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 4 15:59:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494E0106564A for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701C98FC12 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n74FNKgP060147; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:23:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n74FNJh4060146; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:23:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:23:19 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090804152319.GB2571@core.byshenk.net> References: <200908041407.n74E7jc3024539@mp.cs.niu.edu> <20090804145606.GA81630@hades.panopticon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090804145606.GA81630@hades.panopticon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on core.byshenk.net Cc: Dmitry Marakasov , Scott Bennett Subject: Re: is upgrade of devel/lib{tool, tldl}15 to devel/lib{tool, tldl}22 worth it? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:59:15 -0000 On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 06:56:06PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Scott Bennett (bennett@cs.niu.edu) wrote: > > Has anyone done this new upgrade and survived yet? > > I had no problems. There are not really many ports which depend on > libltdl anyway. I've just done it ('portupgrade -o devel/libtool22 libtool-1.5\*') without any problems -- but it was on a machine with only a small number ( <100 ) ports installed. -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL