From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 25 08:08:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B9B0F88; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A8E1D82; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.31.9.204] (unknown [213.225.137.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D995438BC; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 03:08:06 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <535A17DB.3070300@marino.st> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:07:55 +0200 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusmir Dusko , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r352089 - head/print/detex References: <201404250715.s3P7FSaK088998@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201404250715.s3P7FSaK088998@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:08:25 -0000 On 4/25/2014 09:15, Rusmir Dusko wrote: > Author: nemysis > Date: Fri Apr 25 07:15:28 2014 > New Revision: 352089 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/352089 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r352089/ > > Log: > - Bump PORTREVISION for LICENSE adding > - Remove DEPRECATED, EXPIRATION_DATE > - Add license (MIT) > - Support STAGEDIR > - Add post-extract to fix MAN > - Add DOCS and Option > - Please don't deprecate so easily next time, > this port was not hard to fix. What's the point of the last line of the commit message? Deprecation is not about how hard a port is to fix. It's obviously that a large number of ports were identified as by some characteristic and all deprecated without examining the ports in detail. You found this port. You added stage support. You removed the deprecation. That's what is supposed to happen. Had you done none of those things, the port would eventually be removed, which is fine -- it means nobody cared enough about it. By the way, you didn't address the stated reason it was deprecated: It has no maintainer and hasn't had one in 12 years. (still true) John