From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 22:58:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61121065673 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E918FC14 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE9F1.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.233.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p8DMwQds018351; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:58:27 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8DMwKob066538; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:58:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8DMw8lB064205; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:58:14 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201109132258.p8DMw8lB064205@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Matthias Andree From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:13:47 +0200." <4E6F8F4B.3060802@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:58:08 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/cfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:58:29 -0000 Matthias Andree wrote: > claim, please fix, until end 2011, in mail/procmail, in collaboration > with sunpoet@: Procmail works for me, for a friend, & others on list. It was & remains irresponsible to try to force satisfied users to fix other people's reported problems on threat of ports being otherwise removed. FreeBSD would be safer dropping irresponsible ports commit bits inc. yours. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17 Sept, http://berklix.org/sfd/ 22 Oct.