From owner-freebsd-mono@freebsd.org Fri Aug 25 19:50:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mono@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52373DE0341 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexreg@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC86E6E85F; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexreg@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id y71so5046768wmd.0; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:50:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=X01bID07xlCPvyowj+0vcXLqZe/ULPnLdue+kA7tr7g=; b=aTqf4U9VOSDSp/HGs5XpNkah9TziBfmTPX3muwwUYPgo5lLfZrU/mz0NcUXF3Xb+Et Q0WqKHRXHvs1jzvTdyzGL7K8zWB+SAD9fSJT+1Vv1C48bVaeqMTC+1HAtAWqosp/n8EK DzGirrqJPHuVrYTjGximeMYndqngD1BDDU9FA2xO3EXeZoUPpwP/9edGQaJUurrpSukt yQv0DMDWejhcs0+lP3qWmIUHiip/RwCe4Bk+sR/OQqGPEdiMBihbpzQUK5KsUWpJwrXV bifOnkzEOyZNhY2qyIIXY83+Rezyn133pKe8yTYhQxrwIgL2NZWzygX3un6g6tQ5/bK4 d5ag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=X01bID07xlCPvyowj+0vcXLqZe/ULPnLdue+kA7tr7g=; b=gNNuOz5OUviT4D1QiiOKIIdX87uCP2hSqEzfDEuq6+xE4Eks73lPH+2rbQuZUN6l3D wEVrfEina7Z2UTKxLtHTZzRNmoZTfffeiW5+lQUvfuakfLObr/FrO5q1uBvHYUQ6dC+A IeST8dSZmb7yIeatn1fPjwhvVNUFIYeJjTjzJGuCsXpbnIW0Tl7MHe2SnZmgv0vZ1RQO N9g6Ix2prJK/72WKo8/NhlLuXh4E60qxs/KPCgNguS7XJNwCSazCcPbFAWX0PPOp+FAr qrwTpq95iPdVg9XG7lbiibJ+1+zYPpaejYfpI2jcuAWOsFuFGmVENaZ2uYedcUa4kMHQ QOiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5g/BjrYTOayjUXAEheC6ptQdDkwr8AaQ7+KZVy1SQEjnbUSfs8z MLYvbzQGcmA8wOGfNuk= X-Received: by 10.28.9.139 with SMTP id 133mr244204wmj.101.1503690619576; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:c7f:c617:6600:945d:1900:e5f7:4594? ([2a02:c7f:c617:6600:945d:1900:e5f7:4594]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e21sm1683523wme.17.2017.08.25.12.50.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Update on porting mono 5 From: Alexander Regueiro X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14G60) In-Reply-To: <3186981.TyGdqNibkJ@dragon.local> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 20:50:18 +0100 Cc: freebsd-mono@freebsd.org, =?utf-8?Q?Romain_Tarti=C3=A8re?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <17078253.u2dgjZK1Z6@dragon.local> <20170815102120.GA29251@blogreen.org> <3186981.TyGdqNibkJ@dragon.local> To: David Naylor X-BeenThere: freebsd-mono@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Mono and C# applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:50:22 -0000 What about getting mono to actually build first? Sent from my iPhone > On 25 Aug 2017, at 20:41, David Naylor wrote: >=20 >> On Tuesday, 15 August 2017 12:21:20 Romain Tarti=C3=A8re wrote: >> Hi David, >>=20 >>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0200, David Naylor wrote: >>> Here is an update on porting mono 5: >>> - mono: 5.1.0.1 (needs to be updated to 5.2, tests run) >>> - msbuild: 15.3 (needs tests ported and run, upstream bugs filed) >>> - fsharp: 4.1.25 (WIP) >>> - monodevelop: 7.0.1.24 (WIP) >>> - gtksharp20: 2.12.45 (WIP) >>> - avahi-sharp: 0.7 (not started) >>> - bumping all dependent ports (not started) >>> - exp-run (not started) >>>=20 >>> Would anyone be interested in doing a (Phabricator) review? >>=20 >> I don't actively use mono nowadays but sure, I can check if my old code >> tests suites still pass with the update. I have just registered to >> Phabricator and have no previous experience with this tool, so get ready >> to teach me stuff ;-) >=20 > Great, thanks. =20 >=20 > Here is a status update (with patch [1][3]). Things aren't ready yet, but= as=20 > it=20 > stands: > - lang/mono: 5.2.0.215 (tests failing in mcs/class/corlib [run-test-local]= ) > - devel/msbuild: 15.3 (tests failing [with SIGABRT]) > - lang/sharp: 4.1.25 (tests failing in math/measures/test.fsx [Invalid IL=20= > code]) > - x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp20: 2.12.45 > - x11-toolkits/gnome-sharp20: 2.24.4 > WIP: > - devel/monodevelop: 7.1.0.1297 (full nuget package restore required [extr= a=20 > nuget support required]) > - devel/mono-addins: depreciate [2] (broken with mono5), fix dependencies > TODO: > - mono: test self hosting > - update mono-lite version > - avahi-sharp: 0.7 > - bump all dependent ports > - exp-run > - commit to ports > - upstream patches > - fix tests >=20 > Note that the failing tests don't worry me too much. Most of them are edg= e=20 > cases that won't affect the average user (i.e. not a blocker to commit to=20= > ports) - also I don't know how many tests are failing on other platforms (= if=20 > any). =20 >=20 > [1] git clone https://github.com/DragonSA/ports; cd ports; git diff=20 > master..origin/mono5.2.0.215 > [2] A general discussion needs to be had around nuget packages. How do we= =20 > consume them? > i) as downloads with each port containing a copy > ii) local ports with consistency across the Ports Collections > iii) A mixture of the above (i.e. (ii) is there is a native component,=20 > otherwise (i)) > I prefer (ii) as I think it gives the end user the best leverage to patch=20= > issues with nuget packages locally (and to get updates without waiting on a= )=20 > upstream, and b) us/ports maintainer). However, at this point that option= is=20 > at 0% progress. =20 > [3] https://people.freebsd.org/~dbn/mono-20170825.diff.xz