From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Dec 10 9:57:30 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 10 09:57:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26D537B400 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 09:57:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F1D118C6; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:57:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:57:29 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inheriting the "nodump" flag ? Message-ID: <20001210125729.C560@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Poul-Henning Kamp , arch@FreeBSD.ORG References: <97286.976447504@critter> <98900.976464081@critter> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <98900.976464081@critter>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 05:01:21PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386 Sender: will@puck.firepipe.net Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 05:01:21PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Attached is the surprisingly simple patch to implement this in ufs. Poul, having read the rest of this thread, I'm afraid I see more merit in fixing dump(8) rather than changing filesystem semantics. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message