From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 17 15:19:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD1FF36; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F78122A3; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6ioC-1WOkAp0unM-00wYQE; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:13:39 +0200 Message-ID: <53F0C6AB.8070309@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:13:47 +0200 From: olli hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marino@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r365003 - head/devel/elfsh/files References: <201408151704.s7FH4f4W071527@svn.freebsd.org> <20140816164551.GA86642@FreeBSD.org> <53EF9469.3070704@gmx.de> <20140817091822.GA51054@FreeBSD.org> <7012BDCA-0949-4A7F-A017-D8F76476F8B9@adamw.org> <53F0C0BC.2000902@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <53F0C0BC.2000902@marino.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JrKudz3KgUDAdCSoezMNbzOVzeIYNKLGJhwwZcYBWwn8KOZ2Lo/ IYF1dNXJreGpm1uHwBdCw9d/hBdSThiY14MtTlOow+NUe1pBguER7ddmDSfRNJDeSGAa1sJ hV8rm+BR7Z6N/xGrNHCf1TZjHBI/TLfDHPDfA/lqnnx6q2Ev+BgeS6KIgv/tqe7t7oBzsgJ CMWF6jOiKyBWjN+eXw+Pw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger , Adam Weinberger X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:19:18 -0000 On 2014-08-17 16:48, John Marino wrote: > On 8/17/2014 16:29, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> On 17 Aug, 2014, at 5:18, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 07:27:05PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: >>>> There are 1182 ports with an '_' in the name and I think reading a patch name >>>> patch-mod_foo__main.c is easier to read then >>>> patch-mod_foo_main.c >>>> patch-mod_foo-main.c >>>> patch-mod_foo--main.c >>>> patch-mod_foo+main.c >>> >>> Apparently there *are* people who don't see the ugliness of __! >> >> More than one. >> > > patch-mod_foo__main.c is too simple. > Try: > patch-alpha__bravo__charlie__delta-echo__foxtrot__golf__hotel__india_juliet.cpp > > then 20 more of those in the same directory. Very ugly. > > eye of the beholder I guess. > No, your example looks pretty to me ;) At last if I compare your example with '+' or '-' that is also not clash free. patch-alpha__bravo__charlie__delta-echo__foxtrot__golf__hotel__india_juliet.cpp patch-alpha+bravo+charlie+delta-echo+foxtrot+golf+hotel+india_juliet.cpp patch-alpha-bravo-charlie-delta-echo-foxtrot-golf-hotel-india_juliet.cpp E.g. in devel/psptoolchain-newlib it is not clear without reading the full patch filename in which path the patch applies. -- olli