From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 21 4:17:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from cartman.techsupport.co.uk (cabletel1.cableol.net [194.168.3.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599E637B422 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 04:17:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ceri@techsupport.co.uk) Received: from ceri by cartman.techsupport.co.uk with local (Exim 3.22 #2) id 151niH-0002u3-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 12:19:01 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:19:01 +0100 From: Ceri To: Evren Yurtesen Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uptime limits Message-ID: <20010521121901.A10715@cartman.techsupport.co.uk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from eyurtese@turkuamk.fi on Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:08:32PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:08:32PM +0300, Evren Yurtesen said: > I have heard hmm actually read at www.netcraft.com that FreeBSD doesnt > show uptimes longer than 497 days and the uptime information would come > back to 0 (especially in recent releases) If you have an uptime of 497 days then you basically have a system riddled with security holes. I personally believe that the integrity of the system is way more important than whether you didn't turn it off for 84 years or whatever. Ceri -- I probably wouldn't like you. Really. I really probably wouldn't like you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message