From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 29 04:48:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1EAE44 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 04:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x22a.google.com (mail-vc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7801705 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 04:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id la4so5449304vcb.29 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 20:48:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QwBKV2OtWqjomFc4G8IO5xVmWgQ7eWsBVAi6fbZOcMA=; b=hJbu365jRD6aOl62K0zZmYrOcStbutXc+ttOImYR1/ZNJ66bIYlrW5BRSd46XvHL5Z t8TKw/8g8RDZ/rJ6D5nv1GrA27AT/4T4xac0JAU79N1+5uFMCn+wXBb+0IqXYgBCM49S 5Y43Rq5m/T8MDaklNyd8Drd9W1Pps16ZmMDzB2H3T3G0ypuTgLXTYoYAg0MEZd/ipdlU LZFZMNb7xzBdaZ9dRrc17o9e6CI8U6I/5h+hHDIJ4FJ7zXsjWDfpMm5FaEhnCIhx5N2r 4X4Gj1LPmtVfROZAFy5NWcD2k7zwpmq4PUnXytOHy+48FOgC0yKuthHdPvhO5OqXoKbb DlDw== X-Received: by 10.53.11.198 with SMTP id ek6mr4371699vdd.24.1388292535030; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 20:48:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.180.9 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 20:48:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Klaus Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 21:48:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Issues putting jails on their own subnet To: Nikolay Denev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 04:48:56 -0000 Hmm.. I did try it that way earlier, but I'm getting the same issue: # setfib 2 netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 10.0.3.1 UGS 0 0 vlan3 10.0.4.0/24 link#13 U 0 0 vlan4 10.0.4.13/32 link#13 U 0 0 vlan4 10.0.4.16/32 link#13 U 0 0 vlan4 127.0.0.1 link#10 UH 0 0 lo0 # setfib 2 route delete 10.0.4.0/24 route: writing to routing socket: Address already in use delete net 10.0.4.0 fib 2: gateway uses the same route Is there a way to delete it without deleting the IP from the interface? Thanks, Andrew On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Nikolay Denev wrote: > Hi, > > I meant to delete the route from FIB 1, not from the main FIB, like > "setfib 1 route delete 10.0.3.0/24" > > Anyways, good that you made it work using the tunable. > > Cheers, > > --Nikolay > > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Andrew Klaus wrote: > >> It doesn't seem to let me delete it (first thing I tried).. Gives me this >> error: >> >> # route delete 10.0.3.0/24 >> route: writing to routing socket: Address already in use >> delete net 10.0.3.0 fib 0: gateway uses the same route >> >> However, using the tunable, then works perfectly. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Nikolay Denev >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Andrew, >> > >> > Actually you should be able to override this routing entry by just >> > deleting it, or you can also check if "net.add_addr_allfibs" sysctl can >> > help you. >> > >> > >> > --Nikolay >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Andrew Klaus > >wrote: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I'm trying to segregate some of my jails onto their own (DMZ) subnet. >> >> >> >> Internal subnet: 10.0.3.0/24 >> >> DMZ subnet: 10.0.4.0/24 >> >> >> >> Both of these subnets are on my FreeBSD host, but I'm using a second >> >> routing table for my DMZ jails as seen here: >> >> >> >> --------------- >> >> setfib 1 netstat -rn >> >> Routing tables >> >> >> >> Internet: >> >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif >> Expire >> >> default 10.0.4.1 UGS 0 2393945 vlan4 >> >> 10.0.3.0/24 link#12 U 0 0 vlan3 >> >> ---------------- >> >> >> >> The problem I'm facing, is when I try to connect to the DMZ'd jail from >> >> the >> >> 10.0.3.0 network, traffic comes in on vlan4 like it's supposed to, but >> >> replies back through on the vlan3 interface. I guess this makes sense, >> >> because of that second route entry (that I can't override). >> >> >> >> I've tried using PF to force the packets back through to 10.0.4.1, but >> it >> >> doesn't seem to want to work. Is the only other way to use the >> >> experimental vnet/vimage? >> >> >> >> Any ideas would be helpful. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Andrew >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >