From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:52:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE9C1065674 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chet.ramey@case.edu) Received: from mpv2.tis.cwru.edu (mpv2.tis.CWRU.Edu [129.22.105.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65568FC14 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chet.ramey@case.edu) Received: from mpv5.TIS.cwru.edu (mpv5.tis.CWRU.Edu [129.22.105.51]) by mpv2.tis.cwru.edu (MOS 3.10.4-GA) with ESMTP id DBD12472; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:40:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from caleb.INS.CWRU.Edu (caleb.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.211]) by mpv5.TIS.cwru.edu (MOS 3.10.4-GA) with SMTP id EOP26770; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:40:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:38:51 -0500 From: Chet Ramey Sender: Chet Ramey To: yanefbsd@gmail.com References: <87223.61659.qm@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7d6fde3d0902020020n3d5aac5cu4f3381a195d6fdcf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Message from yanefbsd@gmail.com of Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:20:16 -0800 (id <7d6fde3d0902020020n3d5aac5cu4f3381a195d6fdcf@mail.gmail.com>) Message-ID: <090202163851.AA93299.SM@caleb.INS.CWRU.Edu> Read-Receipt-To: chet.ramey@case.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/49, host=mpv2.tis.cwru.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090203.498721F8.0222,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=129.22.105.51, so=2008-12-08 22:38:29, dmn=5.7.1/2008-09-02, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:57:26 +0000 Cc: giffunip@tutopia.com, drosih@rpi.edu, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it becomestandard compiler?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chet.ramey@case.edu List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:52:47 -0000 > It all depends on what features people choose to use in GNU's readline > that makes it compatible or not with libedit. ...which means that it's not a drop-in readline replacement. And here we are -- back where we started. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.tis.case.edu/~chet/