From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 7 10:21:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2B337B401; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A3043E77; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:21:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g97HLPpk071211; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:21:25 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:20:56 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20021007.112056.119814448.imp@bsdimp.com> To: grog@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do we still need portmap(8)? From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20021007063250.GF14070@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20021007063250.GF14070@wantadilla.lemis.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message: <20021007063250.GF14070@wantadilla.lemis.com> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: : It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. Is : it still needed, or can it be removed completely? At the very least, : the man page should stop claiming that it's necessary to run NFS. I think that we need a mtree.obsolete that goes through and deletes these sorts of things as part of installworld/upgrade scripts. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message