From owner-cvs-all  Sun Sep 19 17: 6:14 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from dfw-ix8.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix8.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 658B814EC0; Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix8.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id TAA02467; Sun, 19 Sep 1999 19:05:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from sji-ca50-38.ix.netcom.com(209.111.213.38) by dfw-ix8.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id rma002250; Sun Sep 19 19:04:53 1999
Received: (from asami@localhost)
	by bubble.didi.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id RAA03216;
	Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami)
To: Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@cgu.chel.su>
Cc: imura@FreeBSD.org (R. Imura), cpiazza@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources
References: <199909191144.RAA06647@mail.cgu.chel.su>
From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Date: 19 Sep 1999 17:04:42 -0700
In-Reply-To: Andrey Zakhvatov's message of "Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:44:00 +0600 (ESS)"
Message-ID: <vqcr9juo3c5.fsf@bubble.didi.com>
Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

 * From: Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@cgu.chel.su>

 *   And another question: Should we _strongly_ push X applications to use
 * ${LOCALBASE} as ${PREFIX}, leave ${X11BASE} for only X11 system staff? 
 * I prefer using ${X11BASE} as ${PREFIX} for _all_ X related applications, but..
 * What your opinions?

For X-only stuff, ${X11BASE} is fine of course.  For stuff that has
both X and non-X versions (or the same binary that runs in text mode
when DISPLAY is not set), ${LOCALBASE} it is.

Of course, as Chuck said, some applications that use imake won't give
you a choice.

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message