Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Oct 2017 12:46:14 -0500
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Two jail questions
Message-ID:  <CA%2BtpaK2c99mSXXPVWLQL0q_%2BkJ-xtoLzJtjLqbxDzwTM5KKhNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20171019173224.GA31648@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <20171019173224.GA31648@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.
edu> wrote:

>
> 1) If an application (e.g., sshd) needs to reach the internet from a
>    jail, is it required to have the host system running pf (or other
>    packet filtering software)?
>

No.  See VNET/VIMAGE


> 2) Suppose I have to classes of users on a system: normal users and
>    guest users.  For normal users (including those that are members
>    of the wheel group), I would like those individuals to be able
>    to use ssh to connect to the host system.  For guest users, I
>    want to isolate those users in a jailed environment.  Thus, I'll
>    have sshd running in both the host and jail.  How do I setup
>    such a scheme?
>

sshd in the jail needs to run on a different port if you're using the same
ip, otherwise if you use an independent networking stack you would
configure as normal.

User X on host != User X on jail

-- 
Adam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2c99mSXXPVWLQL0q_%2BkJ-xtoLzJtjLqbxDzwTM5KKhNg>