From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 05:25:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8745416A4CF for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A732243D62 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:25:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com) Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1Agop2-0005zX-Vy; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:28:52 +0000 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, petefrench@keithprowse.com, veldy@veldy.net In-Reply-To: <00c901c3dac1$4a087f40$d037630a@nic.target.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:28:52 +0000 Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:25:42 -0000 > No. Use > > tag = . Err, wont that just grab the ports tree as it currently is, rather than the tree as it was at the point when 5.2 RELEASE was created ? -pcf.