Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:05:38 GMT From: Igor Soumenkov <igor@soumenkov.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/153482: mingw32-gcc is broken - does not build Message-ID: <201012281105.oBSB5cE0079600@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201012281110.oBSBA8EC050795@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 153482 >Category: ports >Synopsis: mingw32-gcc is broken - does not build >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Dec 28 11:10:08 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Igor Soumenkov >Release: 8.2-PRERELEASE >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD igosha2 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #3: Tue Dec 14 12:35:00 MSK 2010 root@igosha2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/IGOSHA-WORK-8 amd64 >Description: The port is marked broken; seems that nobody even tried to fix it and nobody cares. >How-To-Repeat: cd /usr/ports/devel/mingw32-gcc make install >Fix: Patch one buggy include (attached). I don't care if you don't like the patch - it just works and gcc installs. I can't even understand how people can update the port and then just mark it broken - what is the reason of keeping broken ports when the previous version was working??? Who has given them these rights? Patch attached with submission follows: --- work/gcc-4.5.0/libiberty/physmem.c.orig 2010-12-28 13:54:28.000000000 +0300 +++ work/gcc-4.5.0/libiberty/physmem.c 2010-12-28 13:51:13.000000000 +0300 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ #endif #if HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H -# include <sys/sysctl.h> +// # include <sys/sysctl.h> #endif #if HAVE_SYS_SYSTEMCFG_H >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201012281105.oBSB5cE0079600>