From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Mar 16 9:17:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8BB37B718; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:17:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2GHG2H88417; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:16:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@osd.bsdi.com) To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: bright@wintelcom.net, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO MORE '-BETA' In-Reply-To: <20010315201500.A2484@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20010315180837.N29888@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010315194029C.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010315201500.A2484@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.1 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010316091602N.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:16:02 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 18 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Drop by the newsgroup. There was a thread last week about > someone using cvsup expecting to get 4.2-stable and he got > 4.3-beta. He was annoyed and confused because he thought > beta meant "beta quality" (as in inferior software). Well, there are two different things here though: 1. The usage of "BETA" to denote some pre-release collection of bits on an FTP site. 2. The usage of BETA in newvers.sh I think it's #2 which is actually causing all the problems here and I would happily forgo changing newvers.sh until it's time for the actual release. I don't usually mark it BETA myself, but one of my helpers here jumped the gun this time. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message