From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon May 22 15:49:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (polaris.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3286D37B5C7 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 15:49:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jose@we.lc.ehu.es) Received: from we.lc.ehu.es (lxpxfr.lx.ehu.es [158.227.99.247]) by polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA09530; Tue, 23 May 2000 00:41:33 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3929B79C.AFC90693@we.lc.ehu.es> Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 00:41:32 +0200 From: "Jose M. Alcaide" Organization: Universidad del Pais Vasco - Dpto. de Electricidad y Electronica X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: es-ES, es, en-US, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darryl Okahata Cc: Konstantin Chuguev , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mach64 ATI Rage Mobility on Inspiron 5000-7000 [Re: apmd] References: <200005222008.NAA21237@mina.sr.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Darryl Okahata wrote: > > If you want to get technical, I'm using the XFree86 4.0 server, > using the ATI drivers that support the ATI Rage Mobility-P chipset in my > Dell Inspiron 7500 laptop. > Is the XFree86/Mach64 4.0 server slower than XF86_Mach64 3.3.[56]? The XFree86 4.0 docs say that the Mach64 driver is _not_ accelerated. -- JMA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message