From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jun 14 18:37:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA14327 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sun, 14 Jun 1998 18:37:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailhost1.u.washington.edu (mailhost1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA14319 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 1998 18:37:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmorrisn@u.washington.edu) Received: from don (cs237-15.student.washington.edu [140.142.173.136]) by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.11) with SMTP id SAA10560; Sun, 14 Jun 1998 18:37:18 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980614183944.00819660@dmorrisn.deskmail.washington.edu> X-Sender: dmorrisn@dmorrisn.deskmail.washington.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 18:39:44 -0700 To: Amancio Hasty From: don morrison Subject: Re: Draft of Nader letter Cc: Brett Glass , chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199806150130.SAA21132@rah.star-gate.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >So perhaps we should inject our own bias and I do think that we have Nothing wrong with that! :) I'm just trying to defend a consumer advocate idol of mine here, ( <-- there's some bias right there, a little here, a little there, who needs some?! I got plenty. *grin* ) and keep people from sending him undeserved, nasty emails, especially since he would probably advocate _us_ if he were given enough time to learn more about what FreeBSD does so well. >a good product -- Amancio , who recently installed, Red Hat 5.0 then >deleted later on installed Turbo Linux 1.2 and it is about to delete >the Turbo Linux partition if I run out of disk space. Hrmmm, couldn't of predicted that. ;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message