Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:51:05 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: geom_fox vs geom_multipath? Message-ID: <20110922105105.GA1662@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <1108033999.20110921224848@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1108033999.20110921224848@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:48:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Freebsd-geom. > > We have both geom_fox without control utility and strange way of > labelling and "conventional" geom_multipath. > > They seems to perform same task, but geom_multipath looks like > "normal" module and geom_fox is very old one, before "rules" for > modules was settled (metadata in first sector, no control utility, > etc). > > Is it intentional? :) The geom_fox class is more of an example GEOM class. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk57ExgACgkQForvXbEpPzS1tQCfQvFUGVTX2u+aBjWsUpau6Xer Z/UAoNAZ7Y0LBoxdGZFbctwcFMBB4k33 =gt3Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110922105105.GA1662>