Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:39:41 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201796] Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: Set PostgreSQL 9.4 as default Message-ID: <bug-201796-13-xNQzSR5pmn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201796-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201796-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201796 Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff <ports@toco-domains.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ports@toco-domains.de --- Comment #12 from Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff <ports@toco-domains.de> --- (In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #11) > For people using binary packages, there will be a conflict, and they will= need=20 > to dump/reload, or run pg_upgrade, it would be great if there was a pkg-u= pgrade=20 > script for the postgresql*-server ports... Year, this would be great, but what way to use? pg_dumpall, pg_dump, pg_upgrade?=20 One of my databases has several TB - for it i prefer the manual way. Others= are so small a pg_dump would be fine. Also sometimes there are changes which are incompatible. An automatic upgra= de is not a good option in such a case. Sadly this issue is not this easy :( --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201796-13-xNQzSR5pmn>