Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Nov 2015 09:39:41 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 201796] Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: Set PostgreSQL 9.4 as default
Message-ID:  <bug-201796-13-xNQzSR5pmn@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-201796-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-201796-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201796

Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff <ports@toco-domains.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ports@toco-domains.de

--- Comment #12 from Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff <ports@toco-domains.de> ---
(In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #11)

> For people using binary packages, there will be a conflict, and they will=
 need=20
> to dump/reload, or run pg_upgrade, it would be great if there was a pkg-u=
pgrade=20
> script for the postgresql*-server ports...

Year, this would be great, but what way to use? pg_dumpall, pg_dump,
pg_upgrade?=20

One of my databases has several TB - for it i prefer the manual way. Others=
 are
so small a pg_dump would be fine.

Also sometimes there are changes which are incompatible. An automatic upgra=
de
is not a good option in such a case.

Sadly this issue is not this easy :(

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201796-13-xNQzSR5pmn>