From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 25 14:41:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23E916A4CE; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:41:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8547A43D69; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:41:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DQ4lo-0006Z8-TK; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:41:08 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:41:08 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20050425144108.GK91852@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> <20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424210422.03d22990@64.7.153.2> <20050425014453.GA59981@xor.obsecurity.org> <426C6B1D.3040704@elischer.org> <20050425061459.GA33247@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050425062106.GB91852@voodoo.oberon.net> <426CF3DE.4000409@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <426CF3DE.4000409@samsco.org> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Keywords: 579279786 cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer cc: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:41:20 -0000 On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:42:54AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > >According to gcc-4.0 release notes, compilation speed for C++ was > >dramatically increased, up to 25% IIRC. I think 4.0 is good > >candidate for merging into HEAD. > > > >-Kirill > > Is this work that you plan on doing for us? What about the deprecated > language constructs in 4.0? What about the lack of exposure that it's > had outside of the FSF and Apple development circles? No, I'm not going to do it because of lack of knowledge, there are people who have more experience with it than me. -Kirill