From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Nov 27 2:57:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3266237B41D for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:57:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id fARAvOx48237; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:57:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:57:24 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: David Malone Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: misc/32296: brk() has illegal prototype Message-ID: <20011127125724.D34943@sunbay.com> References: <20011127100716.A22667@sunbay.com> <200111271036.aa94603@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200111271036.aa94603@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 10:36:19AM +0000, David Malone wrote: > > Cool, could you please also test with the return type of sbrk() > > changed to "void *"? > > I've tested changing the return type of brk to a int and that > doesn't seem to break anything. I'll try changing sbrk to return > a void *, but if I do that I should change brk to take a const void > * too. > Yep, missed this one, thank you! Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message