From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Fri Mar 29 20:10:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE3D15511DE; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545AE77ABF; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E1842A79F; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:10:28 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r497145 - head/games/opencity Message-ID: <20190329201027.GA1259@lonesome.com> References: <201903291434.x2TEYSFv053140@repo.freebsd.org> <20190329145723.GA93117@FreeBSD.org> <20190329152045.GA17986@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190329152045.GA17986@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 545AE77ABF X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.969,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:10:30 -0000 On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:20:54PM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 02:57:23PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > That said, why `compiler:c11'? > > => "modern gcc" I shouldn't have responded in this thread the way I did. It was rude. I apologize to the community. mcl