From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:59:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77ACC741 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33B3E7FA for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YALrM-0002S9-0G; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:59:28 +0100 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:59:27 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: marekrud@gmail.com Subject: Re: biber missing Message-ID: <20150111165927.GB44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <86mw5ppmw7.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111120419.GZ44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150111120659.GA44537@home.opsec.eu> <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86egr1p972.fsf@gmail.com> Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 16:59:42 -0000 Hi! > If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is > missing from one of the texlive packages? Probably, yes. > Or should it get a port on its own? There's an old (2012) discussion at https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-May/075180.html which suggests that this should be done, yes. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !