From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 17:59:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41D5106566B for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1675A8FC17 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5JHxWgn008291; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:59:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5JHxWbG008288; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:59:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:59:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa In-Reply-To: <4FE0AC19.5080506@pukruppa.de> Message-ID: References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4FE0AC19.5080506@pukruppa.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:59:32 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:59:34 -0000 >> programs like mencoder which require >> the highest efficiency. > Really - just to throw in another opinion: > > As an average user I don't see any performance impact on my clang-built > desktop-every-day-workstation. The only thing that is getting on my nerves > are some ports I frequently have to rebuild with gcc. every time anyone will point a fact about clang not being really the best - some fanatics will reply by going off topic, or worse (fortunately not you) - by aggression, attack or lies. Can you finally behave like normal intelligent people or clang-religion fanatics?! facts are important. ONLY FACTS, unless you want to turn whole FreeBSD project from technical quality to useless propaganda. Please don't do it, as FreeBSD is the only really usable unix remaining!