From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Jan  6 13:35:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA00524
          for isp-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from red.jnx.com (red.jnx.com [208.197.169.254])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA00516
          for <isp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:35:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chimp.jnx.com (chimp.jnx.com [208.197.169.246]) by red.jnx.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA11978; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from tli@localhost) by chimp.jnx.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA04501; Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:34:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 13:34:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701062134.NAA04501@chimp.jnx.com>
From: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
To: dennis@etinc.com
CC: isp@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <3.0.32.19970106151911.00a82cd0@etinc.com> (message from dennis
	on Mon, 06 Jan 1997 15:19:13 -0500)
Subject: Re: FreeBSD as T1 router
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


   >   "Everyone" uses Cisco and "the net" sucks, so what does that tell you?

   For 1, these are "Facts"....every time there is a problem at my upstream
   provider it is some issue with their Cisco router. That, is a FACT.

Fine, but that's not what you said.  If you have a problem with your
upstream provider, that is not EVERYONE's fault.  It might not even be
cisco's. Your generalizations are showing.

   My "point" was that there is no such thing as a magic box....there are
   problems/advantages/disadvantages to all products. 

Then you should say that.  And I could agree with you...  ;-)

Tony