From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 10:22:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5064C1065670; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pawel@dawidek.net) Received: from mail.dawidek.net (60.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EC38FC14; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (58.wheelsystems.com [83.12.187.58]) by mail.dawidek.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F6767B1; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:22:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:21:30 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Stefan Esser Message-ID: <20120109102129.GA4117@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <4F079A76.3030306@FreeBSD.org> <20120107112538.GC1696@garage.freebsd.pl> <4F08C95F.6040808@FreeBSD.org> <20120108.081216.1547061187942402256.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F0A22D8.8090206@FreeBSD.org> <4F0AB60E.7090601@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F0AB60E.7090601@freebsd.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: Making use of set_rcvar. X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:22:40 -0000 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:40:30AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 09.01.2012 00:12, schrieb Doug Barton: > > Attached is a patch that does what I suggested a long time ago, removes > > set_rcvar() entirely and assigns each rcvar statically. I'll commit this > > in a few days if no one objects. (Note, it can't be committed yet > > because the scripts in ports that call set_rcvar() have to be modified > > first.) > [...] > > Index: rc.d/nscd > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > --- rc.d/nscd (revision 229825) > > +++ rc.d/nscd (working copy) > > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > > . /etc/rc.subr > > > > name=3D"nscd" > > -rcvar=3D`set_rcvar` > > +rcvar=3D"nscd_enable" >=20 > Why not generally use >=20 > rcvar=3D"${name}_enable" >=20 > instead of (e.g.) >=20 > rcvar=3D"nscd_enable" >=20 > in all scripts *in your patch set*, for which the outcome is the same? I fully agree. There is one less thing to change after reusing a script. I can't see how this might be a bad idea, really. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://yomoli.com --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8Kv6kACgkQForvXbEpPzTQPQCfSnhWRRriWKFaUFZA4OiOFsHZ R/YAniGIUcT3szuviGkXAQa/qa8w02cn =7oDI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--