From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 6 6: 2:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from webweaving.org (dialfwn06.fwn.rug.nl [129.125.32.156]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F5015749 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 06:02:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from n_hibma@webweaving.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by webweaving.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03054; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:39:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from n_hibma@webweaving.org) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:39:51 +0100 (CET) From: Nick Hibma X-Sender: n_hibma@localhost Reply-To: Nick Hibma To: Peter Wemm Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: USB vs. parallel port In-Reply-To: <20000105153241.B0DC21CCE@overcee.netplex.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Except that I doubt whether UHCI will survive USB2.0. Nick On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Peter Wemm wrote: > Nick Hibma wrote: > > > By the way, at the moment it is better to have a UHCI controller on > > your motherboard. Allthough the OHCI controller is much smarter and more > > efficient, support for it is not as stable as the support for UHCI > > controllers. > > Sounds like UHCI => IDE, OHCI => SCSI ? (only 1/2 :-). > > Cheers, > -Peter > > -- n_hibma@webweaving.org n_hibma@freebsd.org USB project http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message