From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 5 11:39:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD0B37B422 for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 11:39:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: (from eischen@localhost) by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id OAA17559; Sat, 5 May 2001 14:38:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 14:38:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen To: Andrew Gallatin Cc: Bruce Evans , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs In-Reply-To: <15092.6577.733823.946525@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 5 May 2001, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Daniel Eischen writes: > > > > OK, thanks. Here's my guess at what should be changed for the Linux > > emulator. If this looks correct, I'll commit it. > > > > Hmm, I wonder how linuxthreads works under FreeBSD without this > > change... > > > > This breaks at least one version of the IBM JDK that I have > laying around.. > > If anything, we may have two errors (at least partially) canceling > each other out. I think it needs more work/thought prior to > committing. We're still OK with the change to FreeBSDs native signal trampoline though, right? I'll hold off on the Linux emulator changes until we can figure out what the problem is. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message