From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Dec 4 12:31:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C7D15295; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 12:31:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: from shell-3.enteract.com (dscheidt@shell-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.42]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA86770; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 14:29:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 14:29:42 -0600 (CST) From: David Scheidt To: Dennis Cc: Wes Peters , Mike Smith , Kris Kennaway , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) In-Reply-To: <199912041829.NAA16812@etinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Dennis wrote: > At 10:28 AM 12/4/99 -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > > Unless they're running your drivers. I'm perfectly willing to accept YOUR > DRIVERS might be less unstable on Linux than FreeBSD. > > "less unstable". Is that a technical term? With a large number of the systems I have dealt with this is the perfectly correct way to describe them. If you are going to make totally > ignorant statements at least try to get the semantics right. David Scheidt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message