Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:40:51 +0100
From:      Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Fwd: vop setattr and secure levels
Message-ID:  <CAKoxK%2B5xK5ZNe4ycfgOB-AhsnfstAdb-4BU%2BKBEiA=EBnXB2RA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKoxK%2B65_JEBR5izKZzKNyuiGw4MT1Wf7CV7DKLiN-Caj=Qikw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAKoxK%2B43SDu-gYN7%2BHF0-fX%2BQ-OdwjTC-i0_U2R1i_S95Ynjtw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFMmRNzZ5vma7_MP3X-rWEM7Wmaf_Mq_YAzcajoVzkbcRGunfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKoxK%2B65_JEBR5izKZzKNyuiGw4MT1Wf7CV7DKLiN-Caj=Qikw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ops...I just realized I have not pushed the message to the list.
Sorry.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it>
Date: Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: vop setattr and secure levels
To: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>


Thanks Ryan,
therefore is it correct that pretty mich any file system operation
generates a VOP_SETATTR call and that such call will check against the
secure levels?

Luca

> The kernel build process generates some .c and .h files which define
> VOP_SETATTR, VOP_SETATTR_AP and VOP_SETATTR_APV, which are called from
> various places in the kernel.  These functions are what end up calling
> vop_setattr.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKoxK%2B5xK5ZNe4ycfgOB-AhsnfstAdb-4BU%2BKBEiA=EBnXB2RA>