From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Oct 23 15:22:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D49B37B479 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veager.siteplus.net (user-38lc8v4.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.35.228]) by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22949; Mon, 23 Oct 2000 15:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:22:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Cc: forrestc@imach.com Subject: Re: Best alternative to asp Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Forrest W. Christian Wrote: >What most people miss is that ASP != ASP. >I use the apache::asp module, and it works great. HOWEVER, it is what I >call Perl/ASP, meaning the underlying language is perl. >Chilisoft's solution is a unix implementation of what I >call (visual?)basic/ASP. This is what most people consider asp. I understand the difference in what drives these two different approaches. What I don't understand is what differences it makes in the application code. I am afraid that my reluctance to use M$ products is to blame for my ignorance on the subject. -- Jim Weeks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message