Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 18:22:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Weeks <jim@siteplus.net> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Cc: forrestc@imach.com Subject: Re: Best alternative to asp Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010231813230.6874-100000@veager.siteplus.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Forrest W. Christian Wrote: >What most people miss is that ASP != ASP. >I use the apache::asp module, and it works great. HOWEVER, it is what I >call Perl/ASP, meaning the underlying language is perl. >Chilisoft's solution is a unix implementation of what I >call (visual?)basic/ASP. This is what most people consider asp. I understand the difference in what drives these two different approaches. What I don't understand is what differences it makes in the application code. I am afraid that my reluctance to use M$ products is to blame for my ignorance on the subject. -- Jim Weeks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0010231813230.6874-100000>