Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:56:19 -0800 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, j@ida.interface-business.de Subject: Re: Verbose babble in if_fddisubr.c Message-ID: <199610312356.PAA19291@root.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:29:48 %2B0100." <6078.846772188@critter.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>The author of `bootverbose' told me that it was a general flag when I >>objected to using it for controlling the slice messages. > >Is that's me you're referring to ? :-) > >The idea was for it to be a flag that you could set so early that you >could catch boot-related stuff (to which I consider the slice but >not the FDDI messages). As soon as you have single user running >you can tweak a sysctl variable, and things that can use that, >should use that instead. > >So: FDDI should have a sysctl: > > net.fddi.verbose > >or similar, possibly two different ones... Actually, I think the message should be killed completely. I don't see how it is useful in any case. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610312356.PAA19291>