From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org  Thu Sep 22 09:33:58 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB37EBE3CA9
 for <freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DDF4825;
 Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1bn0OB-000IGE-3E; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:33:55 +0300
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:33:55 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, alc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: nginx and FreeBSD11
Message-ID: <20160922093355.GZ2840@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <20160920065244.GO2840@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160920192053.GP2840@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160920201925.GI38409@kib.kiev.ua>
 <20160920203853.GR2840@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160920211517.GJ38409@kib.kiev.ua>
 <20160922075933.GL38409@kib.kiev.ua>
 <20160922082527.GX2840@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160922082740.GN38409@kib.kiev.ua>
 <20160922083424.GY2840@zxy.spb.ru>
 <20160922085320.GQ38409@kib.kiev.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160922085320.GQ38409@kib.kiev.ua>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:33:58 -0000

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:53:20AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:34:24AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:27:40AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:25:27AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:59:33AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > > Below is, I believe, the committable fix, of course supposing that
> > > > > the patch above worked. If you want to retest it on stable/11, ignore
> > > > > efirt.c chunks.
> > > > 
> > > > and remove patch w/ spinlock?
> > > Yes.
> > 
> > What you prefer now -- I am test spinlock patch or this patch?
> > For success in any case need wait 2-3 days.
> 
> If you already run previous (spinlock) version for 1 day, then finish
> with it. I am confident that spinlock version results are indicative for
> the refined patch as well.
> 
> If you did not applied the spinlock variant at all, there is no reason to
> spend efforts on it, use the patch I sent today.

No, I am did not applied the spinlock variant at all.
OK, try this patch.
Do you still need first 100 lines from verbose boot?