From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 20:21:00 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 794D4353 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 20:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE6A1E6E for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 20:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1EE20CA5 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:20:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:20:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=pEz OLld5EGjPLpypjZYcGTKrI4I=; b=lBAv3XErT0PqwoWKQ6PE1lmAwLhOYIcNPm8 jsmkhD6RxNy/6mDbYeG2+1WnFpYX9ihvR6EiL5ePYc49n5hf/bsy/Gg82zjVKfek qSh7jsFA2EdDwsKvyCWpRzhj6zg5ea3E3sSmXQ6YmBx9dFRUITkW4MOvuV1qk/um 0CPAZ974= X-Sasl-enc: pidgLWZjNVyA7fY8n/eLhrrazwDXt7BD2GL1K9Oaxf5H 1388866858 Received: from [172.16.1.145] (unknown [68.117.126.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E77F2C00E8D; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:20:57 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_74408AB9-BABD-4904-A0E4-EFD0533CC02C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: 10.0-RC1: bad mbuf leak? From: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: <20140104195505.GV71033@glebius.int.ru> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:20:56 -0600 Message-Id: <11BB3983-28F7-40EF-87DA-FD95BD297EA7@FreeBSD.org> References: <1387204500.12061.60192349.19EAE1B4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <3A115E20-3ADB-49BA-885D-16189B97842B@FreeBSD.org> <20131225133356.GL71033@FreeBSD.org> <20140104195505.GV71033@glebius.int.ru> To: Gleb Smirnoff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: Michael Tuexen , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 20:21:00 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_74408AB9-BABD-4904-A0E4-EFD0533CC02C Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Jan 4, 2014, at 13:55, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Thanks, Michael! >=20 > On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 07:47:27PM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote: > M> > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 10:54:33AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote: > M> > M> > finally found some free time today to try to look into this. = I was digging into the SVN changelogs of sys/dev/e1000 and couldn't see = any obvious changes that I should revert. Instead I went a different = route and jumped to HEAD/CURRENT. I'm not seeing the mbufs leaking yet. = I'll need another 24 hours to confirm. Hopefully this is a worthwhile = clue. I'm a bit surprised nobody else has reported this type of = behavior... maybe 10 isn't getting the amount of testing we expect? = ...or maybe it's just my lonely, haunted hardware :( > M> > M>=20 > M> > M> Ok, I feel safe confirming that 10.0-RCs are not stable on my = hardware. The mbuf problem went away completely when I jumped to = head/current. > M> > M>=20 > M> > M> Can someone please suggest what patch I can attempt to back = out to fix this? I'd like to try to assist in fixing this before = 10.0-RELEASE happens or we're going to have some very angry users. > M> >=20 > M> > Is it possible for you to bisect head from the stable/10 = branchpoint up > M> > to the current date and narrow down the revisions that introduced = (and later > M> > fixed?) the leak? > M> I did a bisect and > M> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258690 > M> resolved the issue on my system: >=20 > I have just merged this change to head as r260280. >=20 > Mark, can you pleast confirm that now stable/10 no longer leaks mbufs > at your setup? >=20 > --=20 > Totus tuus, Glebius. I'll build 10-STABLE right away. --Apple-Mail=_74408AB9-BABD-4904-A0E4-EFD0533CC02C Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSyG0oAAoJEJg7ZFAfE+JSOmgIAJQXAat4oXKiNREH7QunVO5Q PT3inTgLc4vqzOVnMY+XGrIBj4aQ9BOZ+cp1G50X6bmoKeWbXJil7EdWrQHFcb/f u0SxmzLVpkKnne+hxzT87ZpvVkOa8xSyVX8SZyzaM3adS07PIKL1C3WecC+Kmncd cqldcGnnbUs6iaI8Y95bcpqpJrGYtBsPhJp7R7sag1yHNtkKoFHPBrmNrdk4cGbt i4Q6+pwoPqP8+bm+uaOkxDkvEJbN51tTCCmOhftC+ZfTwlvAA3OW/dxk/X9I4wWB sqPX7XwLv/ZqTh4MCpDV8q/2v2rL+Fk8KzQP4i/WbnHGVJPsEh3Bsd9bSzwnMcU= =L3vU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_74408AB9-BABD-4904-A0E4-EFD0533CC02C--