From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 3 06:47:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7255106566C for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 06:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DF98FC08 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 06:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA29023; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:46:54 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Qzk0E-000ISx-39; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:46:54 +0300 Message-ID: <4E61CD58.40402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:46:48 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110901 Thunderbird/6.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <4e5ba9c3.bzHIw1KEy8R2QcK7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <3420B331-C697-468A-80BA-B31C33804710@freebsd.org> <4e5c5b5f.moT7dLemOuteQJ5T%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E5C364D.7070904@freebsd.org> <20110830201357.GB58638@acme.spoerlein.net> <4e5e458a.Un+VK0itRgItvxbf%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20110831081815.GN2493@over-yonder.net> <4e5f2e26.6PQ5d6F3eauFfAcH%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E5F12B6.3090307@FreeBSD.org> <4e5fa001.BTxOKlcJfp7aZ2KE%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4E5F4807.6070206@FreeBSD.org> <4e62195b.cdaZfeF621ojSqVQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4e62195b.cdaZfeF621ojSqVQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Official git export X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 06:47:03 -0000 on 03/09/2011 15:11 perryh@pluto.rain.com said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> ... keeping local history is of course not necessary, but when >> you need to do some serious history analysis it comes extremely >> convenient. > > In the area where one is working, certainly, but I don't expect to > need the commit history of the contrib tree while working on UFS or > gmirror. Do you know of a tool (VCS or otherwise) that allows to checkout parts of a tree with history and other parts without history? If you talk about using different tool for different parts of the tree, then, well, good luck. >> ... doing some non-trivial FreeBSD development myself ... > > Unless you're considerably older than you look in that Flickr > photo from about a year ago (in Kiev), I was doing non-trivial > OS development before you finished middle school :) What can I say. Perhaps you had a success using your model of different tools per different parts of tree. Maybe it saved you days when you were using a modem for internet access. But I don't see why we have to chose this model now. -- Andriy Gapon