From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 13 23:35:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA06075 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 23:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA06070 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 23:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from nixpbe.pdb.sni.de (mail.sni.de [192.109.2.33]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id XAA01674 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 23:35:26 -0800 Received: (from nerv@localhost) by nixpbe.pdb.sni.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id IAA22984 for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Mar 1996 08:33:51 +0100 Message-Id: <199603140733.IAA22984@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de> Subject: Re: using ddb to debug a double-panic? To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Thu, 14 Mar 96 8:30:16 MET From: Greg Lehey Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (Hackers; FreeBSD) In-Reply-To: <199603132035.VAA12403@uriah.heep.sax.de>; from "J Wunsch" at Mar 13, 96 9:35 pm X-Mailer: xmail 2.4 (based on ELM 2.2 PL16) Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > As Greg Lehey wrote: > >> In addition, I think I'd like to have: >> >> 14) Alt-D: delete word forward >> 15) Alt-F: forward word >> 16) Alt-B: Backward word > > Alt-D is ``ESC D'', right? No, it's M-D. You can usually simulate it with ESC-D, but it's not the same thing. Emacs on serial terminals used to accept a character with bit 7 set as M-, and that's what it did (I think, I'm on thin ice here) with the ESC prefix. Nowadays, with an X interface, it handles things differently. >>> The one problem is the "backspace deletes left" for terminals where >>> the cursor left key emits "^H". In these situations, the BS key >>> becomes synonymous with the cursor left key and the "delete character >>> to left of cursor" function is lost. >> >> I think that, under these circumstances, I'd opt for the cursor left >> function being "lost" (i.e. only available via ^B). Recall that we're >> talking console only here, of course, so the difference is moot. > > Huh? The console can run on a (not known to DDB) serial terminal! Yes, I acknowledged this elsewhere. I still think that this would be the exception, though. Greg